Long Story Short: Similar to “advertorials,” native advertising is designed to be entertaining enough in its own right to compel visitors to consume, be influenced by, and even share the content, be it videos, images, articles, or music, based only on the targeted and contextual appeal that holds on its own. Read the rest of this entry »
The worst mistake I ever made online was searching for a bow tie.
In a world where credit card numbers and identities are being stolen en masse, that probably seems pretty innocent. Outside of the occasional danger of credit card fraud, online shopping is usually a fairly safe activity. Unless you happen to be shopping for a bow tie.
Let me explain. Several months ago I searched online for a bow tie to get an idea of design and price. Later that day, I went to purchase one in a store because I had waited until an unreasonable last minute and needed one right away. A day later the adverstalking started. Read the rest of this entry »
In 2011 Google launched what they called AdWords Express dubbing it ‘the easiest way to advertise on Google.’ In this article I’ll cover some pros and cons of the service as well as clear up a few informational elements surrounding this new advertising channel and how it differs from traditional Google AdWords.
First understand that Google develop AdWords Express mainly for local businesses who want to advertise on the Internet. Because of this, you must have a mailing address for your business, however; you do have the option of hiding that address by making it private (if for example you operate a mobile only business or work out of you house and don’t want your address listed.)
With that understood, let me now give a little more depth to what AdWords Express is and how it differs from traditional Google AdWords.
AdWords Express is local search advertising—only easier. It takes just a few minutes to setup an ad and management is basically automated … meaning you don’t need to touch the account once it is up and running. Even targeting is automated. This makes it ideal for businesses that want to advertise to a local audience yet don’t want the time restraints of actually managing the account.
The example Google gives is when a user searches for ‘flowers in Dallas’ your ad shows and includes a little blue (or red in some cases) pin with it as well that marks the location on Google Maps.
Clicking that pin takes the searcher to the Google Maps page for that listing or, if the listing does not have a website, the Google Places page instead (while setting up a Google AdWords Express account, Google walks you through the process of setting up a ‘Places’ page as well.)
I find the map listing especially useful for those who may happen to be searching using a mobile device. With the many Google apps available (including Places and Maps), and the ability to target your location based on GPS (providing you turn that feature on from your cell phone), a searcher who finds your listing can, with just a few clicks, get full directions (and voice guided GPS navigation—again thanks to Google) to your store location. How’s that for delivering them right to your doorstep?
Google AdWords Express vs. Google AdWords
So you might be asking what the difference is between traditional AdWords and AdWords Express. I find the main difference is in the ‘ease of setup and management’. Where with AdWords you must perform your own keyword research, write your own ads, place your own bids and manage them, target select locations etc…, AdWords Express does all of this for you automatically (yes, including the keyword research.)
Another thing that really stands out is the fact that AdWords Express truly targets local businesses looking for local customers. If you’re looking to advertise to mass audiences across the country then stick with traditional AdWords for that. It is true, you can perform local search advertising as well through Google AdWords, but you must setup a number of variables and combine that with geo-targeting for this to occur. With AdWords express, it’s all done for you.
With all of this no in perspective, and as with anything, there are some pros and cons of AdWords Express.
Pros and Cons of Google AdWords Express
Interestingly enough, the items that are pros within AdWords Express can also be seen as cons depending on how you look at it. Let’s start with the pros:
Pros of AdWords Express:
1. Ease-Setup/Easy-Use: AdWords Express enables advertisers to be running ads live online within just 5-10 minutes. Currently setup is an easy 4 step process that walks you through everything needed to get started. Unlike traditional AdWords, you setup does not require you to do any keywords research at all (which can alone be extremely time consuming) and as far as setting your bid prices, well, Google does that for you by assigning bid prices based on its bid auction model. The last step is determining your budget, but even this is automated by Google. The system automatically recommends a monthly budget based upon the data is reviews on average search volume for the type of service / product you offer.
2. Local Targeting: If you want to geo-target customers on a local level with traditional Google AdWords you need to manually select the countries, states, and regions you want your ads displayed in from a map. With AdWords Express, there is no need for that as it pulls geo-graphic search areas based on your physical location (thus the need for a physical address when setting up the account.) In addition, Google will further target your ads to show only for the category you indicate. This removes the possibility of an ad for ‘flowers in dallas’ showing when a user types in ‘shoes in dallas’. This can be done with some work (and likely a list of negative keywords) in traditional AdWords, but it takes a lot of time to get it right. AdWords Express saves you that time.
3. Account Automation: AdWords Express does not require you to perform manual keyword bidding or analysis. In other words, you won’t have to monitor your keyword bids and adjust them accordingly to maximize your advertising efforts and positioning. With AdWords Express, Google handles this for you to make sure your ads are displayed only at the best possible time.
Cons of AdWords Express:
1. Ease-Setup/Easy-Use: Being a PPC Manager myself I can say that it is far from an easy task—yet it can be an extremely profitable channel when run correctly. It takes time and diligence to get it right. This can be even tougher when trying to develop truly localized PPC campaigns.
I know from experience that running an effective PPC campaign that produces high ROI requires some human intervention. There are parts of the setup/management that you can automate but even then, you really need a human eye to get things moving in the proper direction. This is precisely why I find the automated management portion of AdWords Express a con.
When you automate a campaign you must make assumptions about your business. And this is where many PPC efforts run into trouble. When you let a software system make assumptions about your business (budget included) you miss out on vital human aspects such as intuition, reasoning, logic, experience, and research. No matter the system, these are things you can’t easily replace.
For example, when setting your budget I find it best to do ‘human research’ and have human knowledge of the business you are advertising for in order to set a budget that meets both your needs and objectives. Where Google might recommend a budget based on ‘number of clicks’ it could draw, I prefer to set budgets based upon the return they will provide me (based on historical data) and the constraints of the business involved.
2. Local Targeting: Again, speaking from experience here, with traditional Google AdWords you are able to target at the local level down to the individual town or city—so that only those searching in those areas will find the ad(s). On the contrary, if you let AdWords express decide your reach it may end up too broad or too narrow. Yes, with AdWords Express you also have the opportunity to target based on category, but consider this: What happens if you run a ‘rose only’ flower shop and a user searches for ‘flowers’ (let’s say this might be the ‘category’ in AdWords Express.) Will your ad show? How are the searches divided?
In traditional AdWords you can use negative keywords to eliminate searches for keywords such as ‘tulip’, ‘daisy’, etc… if you only sell roses. With AdWords Express you can’t and that is concerning.
In my testing of the ‘local’ option for AdWords Express ads (vs. those running using traditional AdWords local targeting methods) I found that performing a search for ‘flowers in dallas’ yielded local results even though I was not located in Dallas. So what you say? Those types of searches are inefficient and wasteful because they are targeting local businesses on a ‘broad search level’ (I performed the search from a machine located across the country from Dallas.)
On the contrary, if you used the traditional AdWords targeting methods, the ad would not have showed at all—unless I was in the exact locations that were targeted manually while setting it up. This type of targeting results in more qualified traffic and higher sales.
3. Account Automation: As was the argument I mentioned in ‘con #1′ above, full account automation can be a scary thing and one that can get you into trouble (or at the very least not produce the best returns.) I am all for automation of some tasks (even ongoing when managing PPC campaigns.) However, I also believe human ‘touch’ is also needed to maximize your effort.
AdWords Express automates your campaign based on categories not keywords (remember you don’t have access to keywords during setup.) Without the ability to target via keyword it can be questioned to the efficiency of the campaign and the traffic it attracts. For example, one particular category that is available from within AdWords Express is ‘Guitar Store.’ If you own a guitar store that sells only electric guitars, then this broad option might attract visitors who are looking for acoustic guitars and that isn’t exactly what I would consider qualified traffic.
So once again, account automation in moderation is good (and can be a big time saver.) Full account automation however, might not be best for your business.
No doubt, AdWords Express has a place and can be a great means of getting up quickly for those looking to capitalize on localized search within Google. I would recommend giving it a try if you are considering entering the local search realm, have no experience in managing traditional AdWords campaigns, and don’t have a budget to allow a professional to mange it for you (you want to do-it-yourself.)
However, for the experienced advertiser AdWords Express might not be your best option. Instead, I prefer to setup the accounts and the locally geo-target them from within the traditional AdWords interface. This provides more selective targeting and also can help with attracting more qualified traffic through the use of keywords instead of category groupings, all leading to better performance and increased ROI.
What was the most memorable moment of this year’s Oscars? Lupito Nyong’o’s amazing, A+ speech? The pizza delivery? No. It was Ellen’s celebrity selfie gone viral. It was a commercial success. When I wrote the first version of this post, almost a month ago, I wanted to make a point about how traditional television advertising would someday disappear, replaced by more subtle and creative innovations in marketing. This was after I’d sat through 15 uninterrupted minutes of commercials while waiting for George Clooney to appear on one of the morning talk shows.
I’ve been so spoiled by Netflix, HBOGO, Amazon Prime, and the easy availability of Web clips from my favorite TV shows that I rarely turn on the TV anymore. I do all of my “viewing” on my iPad – and it’s mostly commercial-free. As I sat through that lengthy block of commercials, I wondered: “Why do people put up with this?” There will come a point when they won’t. Luckily for marketers, there are more palatable forms of advertising, as Ellen’s selfie demonstrates.
If only Bradley’s arm was longer. Best photo ever. #oscars pic.twitter.com/C9U5NOtGap
— Ellen DeGeneres (@TheEllenShow) March 3, 2014
Mass media has taken a hit over the last several years, and undoubtedly old and new forms of advertising will co-exist for some time. But viewing patterns are changing quickly, even as old media companies cling to the 30-second spot. Disney, for example, just signed a deal with Dish Network to stream ABC content. The agreement, however, requires the satellite service to disable its ad-skipping technology.
Eventually, consumers will win. As I sat patiently through those 20 or so commercials (none of which I can remember), I thought: “This is really stupid.” I can watch a George Clooney interview anytime I want on the Web. I don’t need to waste my time watching advertising that doesn’t reflect who I am or what I do for fun or work.
There are just too many options to watch favorite shows without the commercials.
Consider these recent developments:
— Netflix posted better than expected earnings last quarter and announced that it has 44 million subscribers. That’s about the same number of people that watched the Oscars, but Netflix is increasing subscribers at a rate of 2 million per quarter.
— Netflix doesn’t release its viewership numbers, so it’s hard to say how any one of its shows compares to ABC’s Oscar extravaganza. Good Morning America has more than 6 million viewers, for example. Still, estimates of how many people watched the second season of House of Cards, their original series, have ranged from a few hundred thousand to more than 5 million. And the streaming service won real credentials after the series won a Golden Globe.
— More people are watching TV on mobile devices, and they are spending more time on digital media than watching TV. Eventually, advertising dollars will follow that trend and shift from TV to digital, according to Business Insider. Be sure to check out the great charts in this article.
If marketers want to generate awareness and leads, they’re going to need to get very creative. Which brings me back to Ellen’s selfie. The marketing innovation behind this is nicely summed up in this lead paragraph from a WSJ story:
“Samsung Electronics Co. spent an estimated $20 million on ads to run during breaks in the Academy Awards broadcast on Sunday night. But Samsung may have got more promotional mileage from Oscars host Ellen DeGeneres during the show itself.”
Of course, this kind of marketing win isn’t without precedent. Oreo achieved a similar result by quickly reacting with a clever tweet to last year’s Super Bowl blackout.
Nevertheless, these events occur just once a year, and brands put enormous resources behind them. What about the small moments of every day life? How do we innovate marketing when mass media disappears, and consumers are free to choose only what they want to see and hear?
In my mind, it comes down to story – not your brand’s, but the consumer’s. How does your product or service fit into the day-to-day experience of your buyer?
Samsung didn’t just pay for product placement. It paid for a story. We’ve all taken the group selfie, and not only can we relate to the experience, we can even imagine ourselves in the company of celebrities.
So is television advertising over? No, but I think we’re going to see a lot more advertising dollars flow toward integrating product with story and far fewer 30-second spots.
Hats off to P&G. The overwhelmingly positive response to their tearjerker commercial targeting moms in the Sochi Olympics (“Pick Them Back Up”), was the latest example of the buzzworthy power of emotional branding and advertising. Almost 20 million people have viewed it so far online. This type of emotional advertising is pretty new for P&G–as Jim Stengel, former chief marketing officer at P&G pointed out, “there was not a whole lot of recognition of the emotional connection with a brand or company” until recent years.
Read the rest of this entry »
Adnimation is a new Cost Per Click (CPC) ad network that uses animated ads and claims that there’s a significantly higher CTR. I’ve decided to try running the Adnimation ads here on my site as a test. You’ve probably already seen them running. I’ve also documented the signup process for publishers like me. First, a little bit about what Adnimation is, and how it works.
Read the rest of this entry »
Below is my latest column that ran in Advertising Age's special 2013 opinion issue, with my own research on mentions of "startups" in Ad Age listed above. I've also been having a fun exchange about this with Kite's Tarah Feinberg, some of which you can catch on Google+ (yes, really, G+ still exists). Tarah noted, "We don't believe that 'brand and agency love for startups is going to fizzle'; we believe they're going to start dating for marriage, rather than just to get laid." I think he's on to something, and it dovetails with the article. The sleeping around is over; now it's time to focus on real relationships.
Read the rest of this entry »
As an investor and a marketer, the recent Twitter IPO has had me intrigued. What is the perceived value of one share of Twitter, and how valuable are social media companies as a whole? When I’m 80 will my grandchildren favorite my Tweet about “Those darn kids r in my yard again! #middaynap”? Or are millions of investors essentially trading a fad?
Read the rest of this entry »